Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2009, 6:50 pm
United States Docket Filing | Questions Presented Case Number: 07-10441 On Appeal From: USCA-3 Date Argued: January 21, 2009 Date Decided: April 6, 2009 5-4; Vacated and Remanded Majority: Souter(m), Stevens, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer Dissent: Alito(d), Roberts, Scalia, Thomas Days between argument and opinion: 75 (42) United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm
” The Lucia opinion suggests that this “continuing position” element — emphasized in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:44 pm
Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 11:54 am
Levy Endowed Chair in Law and Liberty at Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia is up next with the opinion in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:45 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:02 am
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:38 am
Pizza, as some members of the Court have contended, is a lunch cuisine with deep foundations in the history of the United States Supreme Court’s break room kitchenette. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
United States, a challenge to the use of a state burglary conviction as a basis for enhancing a sentence for a federal crime under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 7:14 am
See Germany v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:26 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:17 am
Justice Scalia begins by quoting Aramco on that presumption: "legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:00 pm
Whenever the United States Supreme Court issues an opinion stating or creating expanded rights to criminal defendants, those already convicted who might benefit from the opinion, wonder whether the rule will have retroactive or retrospective effect, or only prospective effect. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case: United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
” Under United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:17 pm
Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean MuchSo much has been made about the United States Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:56 pm
Tuesday's argument in Sinochem v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:25 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:10 pm
United States, 98 U. [read post]
