Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 3,714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2008, 10:56 am
Schooner Harbor Ventures v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
For other Texas (and other states’) cases applying the learned intermediary rule to prescription medical devices, see our post here.Collectively, strike one.Second, Texas’ rejection of design defect claims involving prescription medical products is also reflected in that state’s product liability statute. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
In Kachina Pipeline Company, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
In Kachina Pipeline Company, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:05 pm
This is the rule of exhaustion.In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 2:53 pm
Seinfeld v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:03 am
In view of the now well-known United States Supreme Court South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
Canal Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 11:27 am
Once substantive discovery does commence, I would expect it to proceed much faster than it has, for example, in the USA v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:00 am
Washingon had similar wording, but there appeared to be no state authority on whether Washington defines “seller” broadly or narrowly; the court thus followed other courts which have applied the Florida approach. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:45 am
McCutcheon v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 2:41 am
In Occidental Chemical Corporation v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
Bledsoe admits to paying a third party to purchase her a handgun from a federally-licensed seller. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Part IV outlines proposed national and state reforms. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 9:36 am
” The provision stated: “21. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:58 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia) In Williams v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:41 am
" Using this standard, the Court found that Central Mortgage, a mortgage servicer, stated a valid claim for breach of the implied covenant by alleging that actions taken by Morgan Stanley, the seller and wholesaler of the mortgages, deprived it of the benefit of its bargain and "engaged in a 'bait and switch' by inducing CMC to buy servicing rights to its detriment. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 9:36 am
” The provision stated: “21. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:05 pm
Expect that the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in the case of California Grocers Association v. [read post]
