Search for: "Sg." Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 2:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
Acting SG Katyal, reacting to “factual allegations and the tenor” of Arar’s plea for Supreme Court review, insisted that the case “does not concern the propriety of torture or whether it should be ‘countenanced’ by the courts. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:32 pm
Despite the near constant repition by MSM to the contrary, the Solicitor General does have a "paper trail," but it is mostly on the shelves of the Clinton Library. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:52 am by Richard D. Friedman
You can read the SG's brief by clicking here and the states' brief by clicking here. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:35 am by Big Tent Democrat
From Kagan's SG confirmation hearing: GRAHAM: [. . .] [read post]
11 May 2010, 6:37 am
With the initial tide of commentary still flowing in and focused on SG Kagan's time at Harvard, it is still too early to see if her tenure in the White House under President Bill Clinton will become a significant issue... [read post]
11 May 2010, 6:15 am by Brandon Bartels
In short, we should not assume that because a senator voted for Kagan for SG that s/he will definitely vote for her Supreme Court nomination. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:15 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
He looked to her 5 oral arguments as SG as evidence of "whether Kagan would be an effective liberal on the court," what sort of power she might have over Anthony Kennedy, whose vote tends to determine outcomes as he shifts from the Court's liberal 4 to the conservative 4, and whether she could provide an effective counterweight to the Court's strong conservatives. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:36 pm
During her confirmation hearings and since, Kagan's SG office has called for robust executive power in the campaign against terrorism (and see here). [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:59 am by Big Tent Democrat
Previously I criticized Joe Sestak for his eagerness to rubberstamp Elena Kagan's nomination to the SCOTUS. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:26 am
When Chief Justice Roberts was nominated to the Supreme Court, I got a call from a colleague from my time in the White House Counsel's office during the Reagan years. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:49 am
Carol Platt Liebau, a Harvard Law, Harvard law Review and Hill staff alum, weighs in here.. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
It is a questionnaire from the SG confirmation, in which she says nothing about her views on the death penalty but affirms that as the advocate for the U.S. she will argue its position as expressed in legislation.So we know almost nothing at this point. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:09 am
NPR's Nina Totenberg points out:"So elusive are her opinions that legal thinkers -- both liberal and conservative -- repeatedly ask the question, 'What does Elena really believe'" Says the Atlantic's Marc Ambinder: "The pro-forma criticism will come from the right; the more interesting response will be from the left -- whether Kagan is progressive enough, whether she endorses a variant of the unitary executive theory held by John Yoo and Dick Cheney, whether her… [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:33 am by Erin Miller
” News and commentary frequently note that Kagan has a scant “paper trail” on controversial issues, and Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog remarks that “the only clues we may get from SG Kagan about her election law views will come from questioning at the judiciary committee hearing. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:57 pm by Ted Frank
We don't want to deter top attorneys from accepting a nomination to the SG's office for fear of the political implications for their judgeship. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:07 pm by Ashby Jones
President Obama will nominate Solicitor General Elena Kagan to fill the seat on the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:12 am by gmlevine
One of the three specified defenses to a claim of abusive registration is proof that “you (as an individual, business, or other organization) have been commonly known by the domain name, even if you have acquired no trademark or service mark rights” (Paragraph 4(c)(ii) of the Policy). [read post]