Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 1,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision last year in Lucia v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 am
Writing for the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Posner explained in Flava Works, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Supreme Court General Electric Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:55 pm
Accordingly, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit—the decisions of which are binding on the University of California—has expressly recognized that expression "related to [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
The US Attorney for the District of Minnesota is responsible for that effort. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:49 pm
Aon Risk Services, Inc. of Minnesota, 356 F.3d 850 (8th Cir. 2004). [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
District of Columbia Mampe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:38 pm
In Solis v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
American Bush v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am
For example, in Erwin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:42 am
The district court’s decision was affirmed by the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:11 am
In another case concerning police officer application procedures, the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida held that pre-offer examinations were barred by the ADA even in the law enforcement sector.27 Acknowledging the need to have mentally stable law enforcement officials, the court held that “on this issue, however, the statute is clear… the ADA prohibits pre-offer ‘medical examinations. [read post]
