Search for: "State v Greene" Results 1621 - 1640 of 6,660
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2019, 1:25 pm
[Y]ou’re aware that the State of California requires you to pass a background check, right? [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:42 am by Charles Sartain
The Bill is in response to the 2018 ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas in ConocoPhillips Company et al v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
They seek an injunction against tribal officers in charge of Plain Green and an award of money damages against other Defendants. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
Meadow Greens Pizza, LLC, et al., No. 5:19-cv-155 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Prisoners' Legal Services of New York v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 73 NY2d 26, the Court of Appeals held "whether a document qualifies as a personnel record under Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) depends upon its nature and its use in evaluating an officer's performance — not its physical location or its particular custodian. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Prisoners' Legal Services of New York v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 73 NY2d 26, the Court of Appeals held "whether a document qualifies as a personnel record under Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) depends upon its nature and its use in evaluating an officer's performance — not its physical location or its particular custodian. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 1:29 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Additional Resources: An Introduction to the Big Business of Cannabis Seeds, March 2, 2019, Green Entrepreneur More Blog Entries: What Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:16 am by Florian Mueller
And I learned that just on Tuesday the court lifted the competition law-based injunction, but hasn't stated the reasons yet.That one is a sideshow (deceptive advertising) of a sideshow (a fake patent injunction that had no serious impact), while the one that really matters is the Apple, Foxconn et al. v. [read post]