Search for: "State v. Argus " Results 1621 - 1640 of 85,023
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2021, 1:58 pm by Holly Brezee
Asbill  On July 9th, 2020, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in McGirt v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
One of the last decisions that the Supreme Court handed down this year was Torres v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 3:03 am
Westlake argued that Larson's opinions, articulated in the Ohio state litigation, are relevant to the Kentucy case and thus discoverable pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) and 45(c)(3)(B)(ii). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm by WIMS
On appeal, Plaintiffs argue that the Defendants violated NEPA by approving the project without examining certain cumulative effects -- namely, effects on water resources, endangered fish, forest habitats, and "other resources. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:21 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
State officials are asking the high court to overturn a decision by the 6th U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:17 am by Zach Zagger
The ACLU filed a notice of appeal [text, PDF] in Donaldson and Guggenheim v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
Cisco further argued that Jesner’s stated foreign policy concerns are inherent in all ATS litigation, including in cases involving domestic corporations and especially when domestic corporations are held liable for aiding and abetting foreign governments for conduct on foreign soil. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:08 am
United States, No. 06-6911, argued October 30, 2007. [read post]