Search for: "State v. Back"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 42,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
The case started back in 2007. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm
2011 will surely go down as the Year of the Class Action in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:18 am
See, e.g., Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:22 am
Connor, 56 Misc.2d 364, Polk v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
Twice again, a circuit divisible by three has gotten a capital case back from the Supreme Court only to overturn the death penalty again, followed by a new certiorari petition from the state. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:59 am
After a month long recess the United States Supreme Court is back in session and ready to rule in Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 3:11 pm
Jakes premised the majority of his submission on the Diamond v Diehr decision. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:54 pm
Despite my general approval of certifying state law questions, as I said a while back, I'd have elected to decline to answer this question certified by the Ninth Circuit.But one needs no reminder to recall that my vote counts for absolutely nothing. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 11:13 am
In the recent Texas appellate case of Maxey v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 1:13 pm
Supreme Court might answer the latter question in Jesner v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:14 pm
The Islamic Republic of Iran and O’Brien v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Goldberg v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:52 am
In a rare unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled on January 23, 2012, in U.S. v Antoine Jones, that attaching a GPS device to a suspect’s vehicle is a search under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:36 pm
Apte v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
” Iskanian v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
While Kroger was complying, Gamboa shot her in the back and commenced kicking her in the head. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
After a great vacation in Europe, we’re back in Oregon. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 9:05 am
In Jackson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:08 pm
JUSTICE KAGAN: We'll go back and look. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:57 pm
Rooker-Feldman only applies when you're a "state court loser," which is why it doesn't apply in this case.The case is Green v. [read post]
