Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 1621 - 1640
of 15,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm
Should A have been aware of B’s use, before B can rely on estoppel? [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
Hence, the Court's cert grant in Chamber of Commerce v Brown. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:34 pm
IPO expressly rejected the Second Circuit’s approach inCaridad v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:16 pm
See Molski v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
A v B & Anor, heard 12 Dec 2017. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:51 pm
ShareJustice Elena Kagan’s opinion for a sharply divided court in Pulsifer v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:35 pm
R. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
The court rejected this argument for the following reasons: a) The court could not compare the photocopy with the actual register; b) the regulation permits the Registrar to call for additional representations if not satisfied, which did not occur, indicating that the Registrar was satisfied; and c) the court applied the section 51 presumption that registration is prima facie evidence of validity. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 10:53 am
State Citation: 2009 WY 143 Docket Number: S-08-0200 Appeal from the District Court of Goshen County, the Honorable John C. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
§ 1988(b), [under which] courts “may allow the prevailing party ... a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs” in civil rights cases. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Following United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
§ 5K2.13; United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:21 am
Wilson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
Swiss America Trading Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 7:18 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 am
See Section 191-d (7)(b)(i) and (v). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
In Royal v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 6:28 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 7:29 pm
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Allyson B. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
. . . .B. agreed.State v. [read post]