Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 1621 - 1640 of 15,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2022, 6:25 am by Eleonora Rosati
This very question was addressed a few days ago in the judgment that the General Court (GC) rendered in Zdút v EUIPO, T-250/21 (NEHRA). [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
” The Court refused to shoehorn any concern about Section 1225(b)(2)(A) into what is authorized under Section 1225(b)(2)(C), stating that “the desire to redress the government’s purported violation of Section 1225(b)(2)(A) does not justify transforming the nature of the authority conferred by Section 1225(b)(2)(C). [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:14 am by Roel van Woudenberg
An internet disclosure may be regarded as part of the state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
More serious offences where there is: a) An intention to cause the victim humiliation, alarm or distress. b) An intention that the image will be looked at for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification. c) An offence of threatening to share an intimate image. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 11:48 am by Eric Goldman
Thus, the Thibodeauxes cannot show as a matter of law that Section 230(c)(1) would bar GCC’s participatory-liability claims. * Taylor v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Elliot Setzer
Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982), while the state argued that Rumsfeld v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
In Sweeny v Ireland [2017] IEHC 702 (23 November 2017) Baker J in the High Court struck down section 9(1)(b) of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act, 1998 (also here), which provided for a wide offence of withholding material information from Gardaí, on the grounds that it infringed the right to silence derived from the right to freedom of expression in Article 40. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 12:21 pm by Elizabeth R. Kirk and Dr. Ingrid Skop
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1225(b)(2)(C)—that authorizes immigration officials to “return” certain new entrants to a country that is “contiguous” to the United States while those foreign nationals await a full hearing. [read post]