Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 7,501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Smith v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Smith v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
These circumstances were paramount in the Court's reasoning that, considering the weak distinctive character of the earlier MAGNET 4 mark, the word MAGNET could be descriptive of the characteristics of the goods protected by the Spanish mark, in particular games and toys: it was common ground that magnets had been used for a long time in toys and that there was even a Commission Decision 2008/329 of 21 April 2008 which required Member States to impose the display of… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:46 am
These conditions are also cumulative (Gateway v OHIM, C‑57/08 P). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:10 am
In class 43, the following three trade marks were the first ones filed by Hunan Chayue: The verbal elements of the three respective trade marks (‘TM Bs’) all have only one character that differs from the TM A:TM A: ‘茶 (tea) 颜 (face) 观 (observe) 色 (colour)’ v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 4:31 pm
Richardson, Evidence (9th ed.), § 159 states that in any prosecution for sex crimes where the issue of consent is raised, the reputation and the moral character of the complainant is of great interest and is a permissible area of investigation and questioning for the defense. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:00 am
[Def Noodles v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:09 am
As the CAFC stated in Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:02 am
Final administrative determination for the purposes of determining the statute of limitationsSkiptunas v State of New York, App. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:47 am
Krzykalski v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 am
The other, Ortiz v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am
The woman who identified herself as the inspiration behind the character Martha Scott in the Netflix hit drama series Baby Reindeer has filed a $170m lawsuit against the streaming platform. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:47 am
The substantial truth of this allegation was not affected by the BBC having inaccurately stated that the claimant made such a statement at East London Mosque. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:06 am
S. 164, 168 (2008) (search incident to an arrest that was illegal under state law was reasonable); California v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit issued an order denying rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 8:25 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 4:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:32 am
Applying the maxim "ask, and thou shalt not receive," the district judge in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 7:49 am
The court’s use of the definition stated in Fenn v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:45 pm
” The court stated: “I asked twice and I didn’t get an answer, so I’m not sure. [read post]
