Search for: "State v. District Court (Brown)"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 3,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2007, 5:06 pm
The court resurrected with approval Plessy v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 4:54 pm
LaGrange County Sewer District, an 11-page opinion, Judge Brown writes:Yankee Park Homeowners' Association, Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 12:46 pm
United States and Shah v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 12:18 pm
state AG Jerry Brown. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:57 pm
" United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Following his reading of Brown, Chief Justice Warren read his opinion for the Court in Bolling v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:32 am
The district court found nothing unreasonable about the roadblock and, applying the factor analysis from Brown and Lidster, we reach the same conclusion. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:07 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:45 am
District Court, Northern District Court of Alabama (Birmingham). [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 12:17 am
Id.He was sentenced to twenty-eight years to life, and lost his state appeals and his federal habeas petition in the district court. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 10:28 am
Some other proceedings of the case in district court are also available online. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:31 am
Upon learning of the Thorpe dismissal, Carter filed a new complaint (Carter II) within the statute of limitations, which the district court dismissed under the first-to-file bar. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
In order to give the federal district court jurisdiction to hear the petition, the trial court, and state appellate court must have arrived at a decision contrary to federal law. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 1:27 am
United States U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:06 am
Corlinea-v-Drostes-Complaint [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:04 pm
He noted that the Court in Brown v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:43 am
Ferguson and Brown v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:51 am
Ferguson and Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:33 am
We’ll discuss their decision in State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
DVSS brought a motion in the district court to dismiss Bamberg's claims on the grounds that, because Bamberg did not obtain its products directly from J & J, it lacked standing to pursue antitrust claims based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
