Search for: "State v. Fair"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 27,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court made this ruling in a 7-2 decision in the case of Jerman v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:57 am
The trial court agreed with Allstate, finding no breach of contract or breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:07 pm
" The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the breach of contract claim because the complaint failed to allege the defendant promised the plaintiff it would restrict competing gift stores to four stores.Analyzing the claim for breach of express and implied covenants, the Court of Appeals stated "an implied covenant to refrain from destructive competition may be inferred from a percentage lease, based on the duty of good faith and fair dealing, where the intentions… [read post]
4 May 2007, 11:00 am
In Tate v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:57 am
State of New York, 96 A.D.2d 630, 631 [3rd Dept. 1983]; Senatore v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:54 am
Giving the leading majority judgment Lady Hale stated that, following the well-established justification test, the criterion had to be considered in light of whether it has a legitimate aim to which it was rationally connected, and whether there was no less intrusive measure that could have been used instead after a fair balance had been struck between the rights of the individuals concerned and the interests of the community. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 6:52 pm
In the case of Dietz v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:42 am
(SD Kohli v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:03 am
Supreme Court precedent, in Dusky v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:29 pm
United States District Judge Janet C. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 12:52 pm
Similarly, in “Camp v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
The Eighth Circuit upheld this tactic in Rolwing v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:02 pm
In Barbuto v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:55 am
This is consistent with the high court’s rulings in other recent cases limiting Congress’ efforts to subject states to federal law under statutes adopted pursuant to the “commerce clause” such as Alden v Maine, 527 U.S. 706, a case involving suing states in federal court for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.* The high court said that the 11th Amendment bars a state employee from suing his or her employer in… [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 12:21 pm
He had a fair trial. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 9:52 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
Applying Stack and Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, the judge at first instance accepted this contention, stating that he had to consider what was just and fair between the parties having regard to the whole course of dealing between them. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:12 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
Lord Carnwath agreed with Richards LJ that art 8 does not require access to the best possible procedure, but only access to an effective and fair procedure. [read post]
