Search for: "State v. German" Results 1621 - 1640 of 3,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
 (1709 Copyright Blog) (IPKat)   Germany German Federal Patent Court finds ‘Weihnachts-Zauber’ (Christmas magic) lacks distinctiveness for chocolate confectionary (Class 46) WANGZHIHE: To win trademark squatting case through anti-fair competition law (IP China)   India India frees up foreign payment of royalties (IP finance)   Netherlands District Court of The Hague: Patent Attorney failed to exercise due care; barred from making further changes to names in… [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Durston, as Warden of the State Prison at Auburn, N.Y. 2 v. (1889). [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
 The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:11 am by Florian Mueller
The aforementioned injunction required Apple to deactivate push notifications of new messages for German iCloud users. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am by Söğüt Atilla
The Retromark update also listed the infamous Lidl v Tesco case, in which the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) reversed the copyright infringement finding but reluctantly upheld the trade mark infringement ruling; the Lifestyle Equities v Amazon case, where the UK Supreme Court confirmed that Amazon US was targeting UK consumers; and the commonly misunderstood Supermacs v EUIPO case where, the General Court of the EU merely stated that McDonalds’ use of… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
Thermo-Ply, Inc (Patently-O) 7th Circuit rejects Zippo sliding scale for personal jurisdiction: Poulsen Roser A/S v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 3:01 am
Case C 445/12 P Rivella International AG v OHIM, Baskaya di Baskays Alim E.C. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:58 am by Florian Mueller
"If only 1% of all class action plaintiffs wanted to attend the January FTC v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am by Diane Tweedlie
The appellant requestedthat the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained on the basis of the main request (patent as granted) or on the basis of any of the first to seventh auxiliary requests filed with letter dated 13 October 2017.The appellant requested furtherthat, should novelty be acknowledged, the case be remitted to the opposition division for having a first instance decision on inventive step.The appellant requested moreoverthat the intervention of respondent II… [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am by Diane Tweedlie
The appellant requestedthat the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained on the basis of the main request (patent as granted) or on the basis of any of the first to seventh auxiliary requests filed with letter dated 13 October 2017.The appellant requested furtherthat, should novelty be acknowledged, the case be remitted to the opposition division for having a first instance decision on inventive step.The appellant requested moreoverthat the intervention of respondent II… [read post]