Search for: "State v. Manis" Results 1621 - 1640 of 57,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 7:01 am by david
Texas tells the story of the case, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), that struck down remaining state laws that criminalized consensual same-sex sexual activity and overturned Bowers v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:28 pm by Richard Frank
Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the only environmental case on its docket this Term: American Electric Power v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 4:39 am
Preemption is a big deal: The feds have tried to preempt state regulation of financial markets, as in Watters v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am by Andy Zahn - Guest
McIntyre’s desire to sell as many products as possible within the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:04 am by WIMS
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 11:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
We are heartened by the support of so many states that stand shoulder to shoulder with us in this litigation to protect families. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 5:55 pm by Tom Smith
 That’s different from the argument from the one that many pro-lifers have made over the years which has been more along the lines of we should overturn Roe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
”[9] Nonetheless, the Court continued to defer to agency interpretations of statutes with criminal implications in many contexts.[10] In Babbit v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm by John Rubin
The United States Supreme Court held long ago, in the 1902 case of Minder v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The reason for this is that the Court of Appeal, which hears many more cases than the Supreme Court, is better placed to assess what changes in practice are appropriate with speed, flexibility and sensitivity. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Chris Hajec
Hajec is Director of Litigation at the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which filed an amicus brief in support of the administration in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:56 pm
 Second problem: Too many chiefs and not enough Indians. [read post]
5 May 2017, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
North Carolina 16-1087 Issues: (1) Whether the burden of proof concerning the reasons for pretrial delay rests (a) with the state, to show that the reasons for delay were justified, as eleven circuits and many state courts of last resort have held; or (b) with the defendant, to show that the reasons for delay were unjustified, as the court below held; and (2) whether a defendant who was incarcerated during a nearly-nine-year pretrial delay must also produce… [read post]