Search for: "State v. Miles" Results 1621 - 1640 of 4,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm by CJLF Staff
  CJLF filed an amicus brief in one of the North Dakota cases, Beylund v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
” The Court stated that such ambiguity may be with regards to “time, activity, or geography (at para 20). [read post]
 Under current arrangements, U.S. aircraft have been flying as many as 1,200 miles to reach the battlegrounds. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Matthew Mitchell vs Illinois State Police/State of Illinois, Case #10 WC 35184. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:26 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Zuzanna Godzimirska, The Legitimacy of the International Court of Justice from the Vantage Point of UN Members Sondre Torp Helmersen, The Application of Teachings by the International Court of Justice, 2016– 2022 Gleider Hernández, ‘With a Steady Hand’: Precedent and the International Court of Justice David Hongler, The International Court of Justice and Territorial Disputes: an Updated Systematization Vladyslav Lanovoy, Counter-Claims before the International… [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 10:15 am
This is the first court challenge to a physician-only law since the Supreme Court made clear in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 10:51 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  Those rules were set aside by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in May, 2017, in the published opinion Taylor v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 4:34 pm by HowardGutman
App. 1993) (a “rattle” that could not be duplicated by technicians working on the car did not constitute a substantial impairment); State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:15 pm
That’s not a crime under North Carolina law, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held today in State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 6:14 am
In Matter of Laidlaw Energy and Environmental Inc. v Town of Ellicottville, the court found that the conclusion contained in the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) findings that "serious increases in harmful emissions" from the plant would result in an "unacceptable adverse impact" was not arbitrary and should be upheld. [read post]