Search for: "State v. Peoples"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 44,982
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2016, 6:52 pm
In the case of Dietz v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 10:08 am
The rulings come in People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
In Wickard v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 7:12 am
WordPress, and Ohio State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm
Several weeks later, it denied a similar request involving Nevada’s directive capping religious gatherings at 50 people in Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:11 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:01 am
Texas tells the story of the case, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), that struck down remaining state laws that criminalized consensual same-sex sexual activity and overturned Bowers v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:15 am
In the letter in question in this case, the attorney even referenced the case caption as People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am
Since the Court of Appeals is the highest court in the state and its holdings as to state law are binding on lower courts, one would have thought that the Appellate Divisions would refrain from upholding the denial of suppression motions on the ground that standing had not been established when no such claim had been raised by the People in response to the motion. [read post]
29 May 2009, 9:20 am
State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 1:20 pm
TrueloveAttorney at LawWe assist people with the post-judgment collection process on a judgment that was rendered by another state. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
As of today, a federal judge and the President of the United States support the result in Texas v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am
Indirect discrimination The policy did not put transgender people at a substantial disadvantage compared with cisgender people who were also subject to the policy [74]. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 12:35 pm
United States; No. 10-41311; Keller v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:43 pm
People accused of crimes in the United States are afforded certain rights under the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Secretary of State disagreed. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
For doing what you have a critical federal (as well as state) constitutional right to do? [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 8:35 pm
Here's, for example, what the trial court stated in its tentative ruling: "The three possibilities are term, three times the traditional sentence for the current crime, a term of 25 years of a traditional sentence, which includes enhancements, the greatest minimum term must be selected. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
(I'll leave for another day her implicit claim that the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari in this case and overrule X.)But Justice Liu is also correct. [read post]
