Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 36,627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on the scope of Congress’s power to pass a criminal law to enforce an international treaty, as the case of Bond v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 1:01 pm
The doctrine that Congress’ commerce power all by itself limits the state power to regulate interstate commerce is called the Dormant Commerce Clause, or sometimes the Negative Commerce Clause, because any limits are not specifically stated but rather are implicit from the grant of power to Congress. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 1:01 pm
The doctrine that Congress’ commerce power all by itself limits the state power to regulate interstate commerce is called the Dormant Commerce Clause, or sometimes the Negative Commerce Clause, because any limits are not specifically stated but rather are implicit from the grant of power to Congress. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:15 am
Late last week, the Federal Circuit issued Power Integrations, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 6:28 am
Judicial Watch v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 11:19 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) unveiled the Clean Power Plan last summer, they did so with the goal of motivating states to limit carbon pollution from power plants—a goal that now may be facing limits of its own. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:10 am
The consensus: it will be about the chance that Roe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am
More recently, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Zakharov v Russia stated that “the interception authorisation, … must clearly identify a specific person …or single set of premises”. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:59 pm
The Supreme Court granted cert. in the SAF case, McDonald v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
This case is Kelly-Brown v Winfrey, No. 11 cv 7875 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
” The Court’s Trump v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 4:00 am
There's also a doctrinal response, appealing to Train v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:37 pm
The circuit court dismissed Whitaker’s lawsuit, finding that the administrative charge is authorized by state law. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:04 pm
Jones & Laughlin Steel, United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 2:35 pm
Friday, I argued that there's mo First Amendment problem with compulsory union agency fees in Janus v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:22 am
Here is the complaint in Glacier County Regional Port Authority v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
As none other than Michael Mukasey argued at the time (Padilla v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 12:25 pm
It fundamentally inverts the Constitution’s text, structure, and history concerning the power of states in presidential elections. [read post]
