Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 1621 - 1640 of 71,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2019, 3:27 am
R. 36, upholding the TTAB's ruling dismissing an opposition because the opposer failed to respond to a Fed. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:58 pm
Martin's apparent record with the State Bar:What happened to Mr. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am by Andrew Wheelhouse, OXHRH
Such a matter was recently considered by the UK Supreme Court in R (Catt and T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2015] UKSC 9. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:22 am
The latter part of the presentation covered recent cases on medicines regulation, focussing on R(Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2015] EWCA Civ 1311 (although this English Court of Appeal decision was handed down on 21 December 2015, it may have escaped your radar due to seasonal festivities and/or the mad rush to tie up loose ends before the Christmas vacation...) [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:22 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) A (A Child), Re [2011] EWCA Civ 1037 (25 August 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Deutsche Bank Ag v Tongkah Harbour Public Company Ltd [2011] EWHC 2251 (QB) (24 August 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Yameen, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2250 (Admin) (25 August 2011) Sino, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State… [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 10:31 pm
This is exactly the question that was addressed in a recent opinion by the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in Schnitzel, Inc. dba R&J Jewelry & Loan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:00 am by Josh Sturtevant
When people blindly follow a letter, whether it be D or R, and feel compelled to support every leg of that party's platform, it leaves very little room for reasoned discussion on issues. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:34 am
The case is another sequel to the Court’s ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am by David Smith
Goremsandu, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1873 (Admin) As many of you will know the definition of an HMO for the purposes of Council Tax is totally different from that used in the Housing Act 2004 (and in relation to planning uses classes). [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am by David Smith
Goremsandu, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1873 (Admin) As many of you will know the definition of an HMO for the purposes of Council Tax is totally different from that used in the Housing Act 2004 (and in relation to planning uses classes). [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:47 am
R & P, Inc.Citation: 2009 WY 56Docket Number: S-08-0116Appeal from the District Court of Teton County, the Honorable Nancy J. [read post]