Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 40,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2023, 9:57 am
New Directions Program v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
The post Residency v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Fund v New York City Police Dept., 125 AD3d 531, leave to appeal denied 26 NY3d 919 [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Fund v New York City Police Dept., 125 AD3d 531, leave to appeal denied 26 NY3d 919 [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 3:36 pm
O’Bannon v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:04 am
Supreme Court in Apple v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
Funny ones really. 00:35:19 gretchen desutter: A favorite scene with Monica was a Twins v Yankees game. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:53 am
State, 499 S.W.3d 438, 443 (Tex. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
Here, I want to explore (where "explore" is the reserved academic word choice standing in for "mock and deride") one especially odd aspect of Speakerguy's theocracy. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
Marina Coast Water District v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
The defendant loses the habeas petition.The case is Wilson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "ADR benefits are awardable only where the individual's disability was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, i.e., "a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact'", citing Matter of Brown v Kelly, 100 AD3d 480, quoting Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of NY, Art. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "ADR benefits are awardable only where the individual's disability was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, i.e., "a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact'", citing Matter of Brown v Kelly, 100 AD3d 480, quoting Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of NY, Art. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm
It is in this context that the SRB v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 11:30 am
(b); see People v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 8:35 am
” Phillips v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
And in 2001 the Supreme Court ruled in Alexander v. [read post]