Search for: "Still v. State" Results 1621 - 1640 of 45,222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2015, 8:37 pm
It remains illegal under federal law, and it's still considered a Schedule I narcotic - the most dangerous level of the drug. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities, the Court distinguished its previous decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am by INFORRM
In reaching this conclusion, the Senior Master referred to: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 at [132]; McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 per Buxton LJ at [8]; Wainwright v The Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 at [18]-[19] and [23], [43] and [62]  Perhaps unsurprisingly, the notion of a tort of physical intrusion privacy were given short shrift. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
Two years ago, the First Circuit said flatly that it was still required to follow the Supreme Court’s summary, one-sentence ruling in 1972, in the case of Baker v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 8:16 am by Christopher Mathews
Regrettably, there is still no explanation regarding why the specific orders issued to LTC Lakin in this case were illegal. [read post]