Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer" Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 6:21 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Were that not enough, AHM's standing hurdle is even greater because, as the case reaches the Supreme Court, AHM's claims have been narrowed. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 12:36 pm by The Legal Blog
Singhvi Supreme Court of India The Supreme Court in Arun Kumar Aggarwal Vs. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Reese v Daines, 2008 NY Slip Op 51879(U), decided on September 15, 2008, Supreme Court, Erie County, Patrick H. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
Thus, it is asserted that "no rights are absolute" and that courts may deny the application of a right where "the Government's regulatory interest in community safety. . . outweigh[s] an individual's liberty interest. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
  He's flirted with the idea, but, then, he's flirted with so many different ideas before dropping them when they're politically inconvenient. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
The seeds of most of them can also be found in the Supreme Court's crucial holding in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 12:00 am by Jason Kelley
EFF’s Executive Director, Cindy Cohn, kicked off the event by pointing out that the world may be changing shape--this is our second online Pioneer Award Ceremony, after all--but EFF was built for change, and we’ve had significant successes over the past year: our fight to keep dangerous scanning software off Apple devices; passing one of the largest state investments in public fiber broadband in U.S. history in California; developing guides to help observe visible and… [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:33 am by Steve Hall
" Today's decision, and the RJA itself, stand as a powerful rebuke to the Supreme Court's defeatist view of discrimination. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 7:26 am by Josh Blackman
Rejecting the 5th Circuit's reasoning, the Supreme Court said the 5th Circuit had applied an "overly cramped view" of the court's precedent for when people may sue for First Amendment retaliation claims. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
  She observes, for example, that "[s]ince 2008, the world has experienced an economic cataclysm. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:32 am by Susan Brenner
He found that the Supreme Court's decisions in Katz v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:47 am by Eugene Volokh
The exact request was "[t]wo cents worth for each [decedent]; six cents a mile for the six hundred and fifty [million] miles … they traveled in the year that they took these people's lives. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Sexual harassment is a form of unlawful sex discrimination, a principle recognized by the Supreme Court in 1986 in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:20 pm
Accordingly, the order of Supreme Court granted the infant's motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim upon the accused parties should be reversed without costs and the motion denied. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:06 am
One member of Entwistle's defense team sought me out to privately complain of my recorded observations, and to protest those observations. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 12:10 pm by Lovechilde
No Supreme Court has struck down a president's signature piece of legislation in over 75 years. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 4:27 am
Let's hope that Florida's Supreme Court will look at the issue and themselves determine how unreliable witnesses are in criminal cases. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 3:30 am by Sasha Volokh
Supreme Court is supreme; but this shows that a lot depends on how willing a court is to accept that there's a real burden in a particular case. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 3:35 am
Judges act as though they are carrying out some higher calling when they decline to act, and maybe they are, but if what they are doing is incomprehensible to people, they are likely to draw their conclusions about the quality of the case based on the outcome.Lederman says that the Supreme Court's standing doctrine is "a mess" -- but that's mainly true because the Court is composed of some very different… [read post]