Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 1621 - 1640 of 4,753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2010, 6:38 am by Matthew Kolken
However, recent Supreme Court, federal court, and agency decisions have ignored this longstanding analysis and have instead examined these issues through the lens of Taylor v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:54 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Habeas Opinions Body: Below is today's habeas Appellate Court opinion:AC31835, AC31923, AC31942 - Taylor v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:07 pm by Julie Lam
Taylor, and remanded the case to the trial court for resentencing. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
  Fiduciary Duties under the Uniform Partnership Act The question that is lurking in this decision, Taylor v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:05 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, the 80-20 National Asian American Educational Foundation, et al, in Support of Petitioner Brief for Mountain States Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner Brief for the Pacific Legal Foundation, Center for Equal Opportunity, the  American Civil Rights Institute, the National Association of Scholars, and Project 21 in Support of Petitioner Brief for Scholars of Econmics and Statistics in Support of Petitioner Brief for Southeastern Legal Foundation… [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:01 am by Howard Bashman
The Court, without Justice Barrett participating, issued a per curiam opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:27 pm by Barry Eagar
Case: Paul Andrew Cronk [2012] APO 28CitedWellcome Foundation Ltd v VR Laboratories (Aust) Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 12Aktiebolaget Hassle v Alpharpharm Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 59Meyers Taylor Pty Ltd v Vicarr Industries Ltd [1977] HCA 19NotesIt is clear that any potential solution to a problem will not be obvious unless it would have been a matter of routine to try that solution, but with the significant caveat that there must be an expectation that the potential… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
A similar issue was addressed by the Appellate division in City of Rochester v Public Employment Relations Board, 15 AD3d 922, Leave to appeal denied, 4 N.Y.3d 710. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:20 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
City of Schenectady v New York State Public Employment Relations Board (PERB), 136 AD3d 1086Leave to appeal granted by Court of Appeals,Issue: Did the Taylor Law, as codified in Civil Service Law Article 14, supersede Article 9 of the Second Class Cities Law thereby making City of Schenectady's police disciplinary procedure a mandatory subject of collective bargaining? [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:29 pm by Jon Sands
The Ninth Circuit vacated a sentence and remanded for resentencing, holding that a federal sentencing court, following Taylor v. [read post]