Search for: "Total Plan Services Inc"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 1,855
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2024, 10:12 am
Appellant Nassiri argued that the creek area of the project site (i.e., the creek and adjacent trees) has habitat value for these species and that the species were “rare” within the meaning of the infill exemption because the US Fish and Wildlife service has listed them as “Bird Species of Conservation Concern. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 11:51 am
As the IMF loan was being negotiated, Bloomberg reported on 24 September 2018 that BlackRock Inc., Carval Investors LLC and other funds that specialize in distressed debt were interested in opportunities to finance Argentine companies, particularly where traditional bank lending may be more difficult to come by following the “notebooks scandal“. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 8:16 am
As Yahoo Finance reported, crypto will not be used in the form of “other financial services tools. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
After the imposition of the total ban for J.I. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
Several patent-related cases, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:36 am
The Nuns lawsuit, “Camelot Distribution Group Inc, v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
The developers named as real parties are Solargen Energy, Inc., Solargen Energy DE, PV2 Energy, LLC, PF2 Energy Holdings, LLC, and Nevo Energy, Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 9:17 am
They have raised a total of $150 of their $500k goal. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm
Earlier in 2009, Corn Plus paid a penalty totaling $150,000 to resolve a criminal water quality charge brought by the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
Earlier in 2009, Corn Plus paid a penalty totaling $150,000 to resolve a criminal water quality charge brought by the U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
Thus, Judge Anderson intensely focuses upon the following Capital One/Mandiant engagement timeline: November 30, 2015: Capital One enters into a master services agreement (“MSA”) with FireEye, Inc. and Mandiant, and thereafter enters into periodic statements of work (“SOW”) and purchase orders with Mandiant pursuant to the MSA. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
She awarded Phoenix a total of $3,983,014 in attorney fees. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:06 pm
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., of Greensboro, N.C., will pay a civil penalty of $9,152, and Eau Claire Co-op Oil Company, Inc., of Eau Claire, Wis., will pay a civil penalty of $6,864, according to separate but related administrative consent agreements filed by EPA in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:00 am
District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment against LBRY, Inc., holding that LBRY offered a crypto asset in violation of the registration provisions of federal securities laws. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment against LBRY, Inc., holding that LBRY offered a crypto asset in violation of the registration provisions of federal securities laws. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
The violations included exceeding the discharge limits for Escherichia coli (E. coli), biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, pH and total residual chlorine. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
See Duane Reade, Inc., 342 NLRB 1016, 1017 (2004). [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, Ceres has issued reports focused on transition plans and has said that such plans are likely to require expenditures on, among other things, “capital investments; investments in new staff and expertise; process efficiencies; research, development, and deployment of new technologies and designs; and collaboration. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
At issue was the adequacy of the hazards analysis evaluating whether the bridge replacement project would: (i) “impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan,” or (ii) “expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires. [read post]
