Search for: "U.S. District Court for Northern District of California"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 3,656
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 8:56 pm
Sandoz Inc. et al. 3:16-cv-02581; filed May 12, 2016 in the Northern District of California • Plaintiffs: Amgen Inc.; Amgen Manufacturing, Ltd. [read post]
18 May 2016, 10:53 am
Earlier this month, the District Court for the Northern District of California denied a motion to dismiss a class action alleging that Facebook had unlawfully collected biometric data. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
The district court granted a motion to dismiss. [read post]
13 May 2016, 11:46 am
District Court for the Northern District of California, the Court upheld my theory that the look of its smart device app icon was a protectable trade dress feature. [read post]
12 May 2016, 11:17 am
Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California.SEC Press Release--- If you need help with a securities litigation, arbitration or litigation issue, email Mark Astarita or call 212-509-6544 to speak to a securities lawyer. [read post]
12 May 2016, 4:34 am
As an observer of two major disputes that started in the Northern District of California, Apple v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 12:49 pm
In a proposed settlement agreement filed in the Northern District of California, Uber says it is ready to resolve two class actions: O’Connor v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 3:38 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order granting in part and denying in part the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:11 am
District Court for the Northern District of California recently held that an amendment to the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) enacted as part of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 applies to calls made in 2014 “solely to collect a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States,” and therefore granted […]Eric Tsai [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:10 am
District Court for the Northern District of California set aside the 30-year tenure provision of the 2013 revisions to the eagle permit regulations on NEPA grounds, concluding that the Service had failed to demonstrate an adequate basis in the record for deciding not to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement or Environmental Assessment. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:34 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California invalidated the amendment extending the term of BGEPA permits on National Environmental Policy Act grounds. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:26 pm
The answer was “no” in a recent order from the Northern District of California, Kleiner v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:30 am
District Court for the Northern District of California will continue its Ombuds program indefinitely after a two-year trial. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:06 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California issued an Order Denying a Motion to Dismiss because the patent at issue, U.S. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:02 pm
South Korea fears that its northern neighbor could conduct a nuclear test before or even during the rare congress. [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:21 am
Thankfully, the top U.S. court will interpret a statute that the Federal Circuit and Judge Koh in the Northern District of California believe allows an unapportioned disgorgement of infringer's profits regardless of how many other patented and non-patented elements a product may have--an approach that is not applied to any other intellectual property right. [read post]
1 May 2016, 6:18 am
Board of Rabbis of Northern & Southern California, 2016 U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:01 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California included pre-suit attorney’s fees, which illustrates the impact of the recent Supreme Court holdings. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:37 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California denied the EEOC’s motion for partial summary judgment, finding there was a disputed issue of material fact as to whether the employee’s filing of the EEOC charge was the but-for cause of Mr. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:45 am
’s motion to dismiss a data breach class action against it was rejected by the Northern District of California due to the sophisticated nature of the attack and because the stolen data was known to be decrypted and had surfaced on websites used by hackers. [read post]
