Search for: "United States v. Gross"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 1,808
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
Under the Stimulus Bill, small businesses whose gross receipts do not exceed $15 million can elect to carryback net operating losses incurred after 2007 as many as 5 years. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:39 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Sentence is remanded for resentencing in light of Amendment 709 to the United States Sentencing Guideline U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 19, 2009 US v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 12:13 am
Three more amicus briefs supporting the petition for writ of certiorari in Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 11:56 am
For 22 years, since the money laundering statutes enactment in 1986, courts have construed "proceeds" to mean gross receipts and not net profits of illegal activity consistent with the original intent of Congress.But in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
See Malpiede v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
United States Issue: Whether Harris v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:39 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Tong v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
Even though, the United States has not entered into a comprehensive double-taxation avoidance agreement with Hong Kong [1] this jurisdiction is still attractive for investors to incorporate a company to manage assets in the PRC. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 10:32 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 2:40 am
Indeed, at least in part because of the scare, about one in 12 children does not receive the MMR vaccine in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Charges filed by UNITE HERE; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
The 1953 case in which the Supreme Court established it, United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
See Eurowest Cinemas LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
For 22 years, since the money laundering statutes enactment in 1986, courts have construed "proceeds" to mean gross receipts and not net profits of illegal activity consistent with the original intent of Congress.But in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:48 am
But what began as a discussion about specific sexual harassment opinions seemed to transform into a debate over the state of feminism in the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:40 am
The Tax Court ruled in Magdalin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:38 am
U.S. (08-67) — bar to re-trial after partial acquittal Tues., March 24 Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 7:38 am
United States v. [read post]
