Search for: "United States v. Miller" Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2006, 4:42 pm
In 1973, the Supreme Court attempted to define obscenity in Miller v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
This term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Jones v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:20 am by Joshua Matz
Hobbs and Miller v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the United States Supreme Court, the Michigan Supreme Court, this Court, and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Sadly, the Supreme Court majority elided those difficulties in Brnovich v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:28 am by Jon Hyman
We're doing DEI wrong — via Business Insider Can states legally ban "woke" training in the workplace? [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 4:54 am
In fact, businesses that do not have their headquarters or principal place of business in the United States are required to hire a U.S. attorney to apply for registration of their marks. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Against this backdrop, we should be granting Pennsylvania's petition for en banc review, supported by 17 other states and the District of Columbia as amici, or at least holding it c.a.v. pending the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 2:49 am
Among the significant opinions he authored was United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:59 pm by Josh Blackman
Miller, found an Appointments Clause violation with respect to the task force that administers the ACA's contraception mandate: With respect to one of the challenged administrative bodies, the United States Preventive Services Task Force, we agree that the unreviewable power it wields—the power to issue preventive-care recommendations that insurers must cover by law—renders its members principal officers of the United States who have not… [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 11:18 am by Garrett Hinck
Iraq experts said the United State’s neutral stance was a de facto endorsement of the Iraqi action. [read post]