Search for: "United States v. North Carolina" Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by WIMS
EPA also filed a petition, as did a coalition of 15 states and cities (North Carolina, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Baltimore, Bridgeport, Chicago, New York City, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C.). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by WIMS
EPA also filed a petition, as did a coalition of 15 states and cities (North Carolina, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Baltimore, Bridgeport, Chicago, New York City, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C.). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:00 am by Goldberg Segalla LLP
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment that it owed no duty to defend or indemnify and that the policies were properly rescinded. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the “theme out of the United States Supreme Court [yesterday was] materiality. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
And North Carolina’s law prohibiting transgender people from accessing restrooms and other facilities consistent with their gender identities sparked massive boycotts by businesses and individuals. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 8:14 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlIn the Matter of the Adoption of B.B. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen notes that supplemental briefs filed in the wake of Whitford may delay disposition of an appeal in a North Carolina partisan-gerrymandering case. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am by Maureen Johnston
American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina 14-35Issue: Whether the government speech doctrine permits the state of North Carolina to promote its “Choose Life” message through a specialty license plate program over which it exercises complete and effective control without also offering a pro-choice specialty plate. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  Id. at *10-11.Third, to supply the otherwise missing element of “foreseeability,” Block – relying on Minnesota, rather than North Carolina law – invented a purported “duty to test” never before seen in North Carolina, see Couick v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm by Staley Smith, Quinta Jurecic
The gunman, whom the F.B.I. has identified, was later caught across the border in North Carolina. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 8:44 am by Jenny Gesley
Even today, it remains the basis of most regulations of the laws of war for the United States and is referred to in the foreword to the Department of Defense Laws of War Manual. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 7:05 am by Aurora Barnes
North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
This guide has been compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a portion of their One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2013 dissent in United States v. [read post]