Search for: "V-lawyer"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 74,062
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2021, 5:36 am
This is illustrated in the November 2020, opinion styled, Tim Long Plumbing, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:23 am
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals expressed its frustration with the attorney in a footnote to an unpublished opinion, Espitia v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 11:36 am
United States of America v. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 6:14 am
The opinion is styled, Laura Atkinson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 5:53 am
The opinion is from the Western District of Texas, Waco Division, and is styled, Waco Hippodrome Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 5:44 am
This is illustrated in a 1979, Fort Worth Court of Appeals opinion styled, Leach v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 7:44 am
What is the People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
New Jersey lawyer Steven Sanders, who has long been thoughtfully examining the issue of how to deal with Blakely errors, sent me this thoughtful comment about Justice Scalia's curious work yesterday in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:10 pm
(Mader v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 7:57 am
The Court's opinion in Padilla v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm
That was the Supreme Court's ruling this week in the case of Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 7:17 am
Supreme Court this morning went back into the area of criminal defense lawyers giving bad advice on the immigration consequences of a conviction, a can of worms it opened in its 2010 decision of Padilla v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 6:50 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:15 pm
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP. v Duane Reade (2012 NY Slip Op 05889): The New York Appellate Division has held that 3 emails between a lawyer and a corporate client set forth a fee agreement between the two parties. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:25 pm
In Sitar v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 5:54 am
The RIAA lawyers are seeking an adjournment of the appellate argument scheduled to be conducted on May 19th at 2:00 PM in Manhattan in Lava Records v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
