Search for: "Wells v. Park" Results 1621 - 1640 of 5,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2012, 9:33 am by Alfred Brophy
 Well ... it just so happens that I taught on Thursday -- yeah, irony of irony, isn't it -- Rice v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 11:33 am by Steven Cohen
Frech opined that Simon has market power in the University Park market, as well as any market that Simon uses as leverage in it’s negotiations with retailers. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
The SUV drove around the parking lot, pulled out onto the street, pulled back into the parking lot, and then parked within two cars from Detective Stephens. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 11:40 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
For example, the Observer reported that Sean MacPherson partnered with Goode to open the Ludlow Hotel as well as the Park restaurant. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
From Katfriend Ken Moon (IP/IT consultant to AJ Park, Auckland, New Zealand) comes this most helpful analysis of Jonathan Dixon v The Queen [2015] NZSC 147, a New Zealand Supreme Court ruling that goes further than traditional British rulings by analogising digital files to "property". [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Officer A’s vehicle was parked next to the appellant’s. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 1:22 pm
Tommy Davis and Adele Jones have been charged with felony robbery and dealing in stolen property charges after allegedly robbing Rohan Dawkins, a mentally challenged Florida man who had purchased a $150 GameStop collector’s edition copy of "Grand Theft Auto V", of the video game as he left a GameStop store in a Delray Beach parking lot. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To sustain a cause of action for breach of contract, the plaintiff must prove the existence of a contract, the plaintiff’s performance, the defendant’s breach, and damages (see Harris v Seward Park Hous. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
In this Clean Air Act case, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy) challenges an attorneys' fees award by attacking the nature of the victory supporting the award, as well as the merits order on which the fee award was based -- summary judgment in favor of environmental group Plaintiffs Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, Environmental Defense Fund, National Parks Conversation Association, Natural Resources Defense Council, and the Sierra Club (Plaintiffs). [read post]