Search for: "YOUNG v. UNITED STATES" Results 1621 - 1640 of 4,074
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am by Ad Law Defense
Dec. 12, 2016) (Statement of Interest)) and through consent decrees (see Nat’l Fed. of the Blind and United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by Ronald Collins
” (This may have been the first sign of Ruth’s future role as one of the most active and precise questioners on the United States Supreme Court Bench.) [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 7:46 am by Robert L. Arrington
Horton petitioned for review of this ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which overturned the Board in 2013. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by April Doss
There were clearly no Fourth Amendment concerns in the initial collection, as this was classic FAA 702 targeting of a non-U.S. person outside the United States, and there are no allegations of improper targeting, retention, dissemination, or other use of the target’s communications. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The system was attacked as a violation of the separation of church and state in Zelman v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 3:30 am by Kris Miccio
Kris Miccio Adam Cohen has written an exhaustive account of the nexus between eugenics, racism and immigration law in the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am by Florian Mueller
It has taken the Supreme Court of the United States less than two months since a mid-October hearing and less than ten pages (counting only the opinion per se, not the two-page syllabus) to determine and explain that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit got the law on design patent damages fundamentally wrong. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
’s opposition to returning to Peru and desire to remain in the United States was not an abuse of discretion. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:49 am by Paul Adam
  The Charter pertains to state action. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:02 am by Adam Klein
  That follows from the originalist view that the Constitution’s text means today what the people of the United States understood it to mean when it was ratified. [read post]