Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 1,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm
Trump celebrated his 365th day as president of the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 5:34 pm
Recently (1996 through 2009), four or possibly five jaguars have been documented in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:57 am
Circuit vacated both the Trump administration’s repeal of the CPP and the ACE Rule, and sent the case back to the EPA for additional proceedings. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:20 am
Spokeo, Inc., and United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 5:30 am
Amparada en esa ley, la Gobernadora Wanda Vázquez, declaró un estado de emergencia por Covid-19(23). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am
The legal presumption in favour of life: Mr Justice Peter Jackson in A Local Authority v E [2012] (Infra) at para. 120 states: “All human life is of value and our law contains the strong presumption that all steps will be taken to preserve it, unless the circumstances are exceptional. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 8:30 pm
" Marshall was correct in McCulloch v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
He might have given the impression, he said, that ‘the ace of trumps always wins the trick’. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself: see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9] A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
Facebook has said that a legal challenge against the way it transfers EU user data to the United States was “deeply flawed” and should not be referred to the EU’s top court because ample privacy protections were already in place. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
The Court of Appeal went back to the case of Re S [2004] UKHL 47; [2005] 1 AC 593, which the President relied upon in indicating that Ward should no longer be followed. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:05 pm
Noel Canning and McCullen v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
In Shevill v Presse Alliance ([1996] AC 959 and [1995] ECR I-415) it was held that publication of defamatory material in this jurisdiction is a “harmful event” for the purposes of Art. 5(3). [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
They have the same rights of free speech as anyone else, subject to the same constraints” (AG v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109, 201). [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am
Article 31(1) VCLT states that "A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
To cut to the chase (and omit the first hundred or so paragraphs), following Lord Kerr in A v Essex County Council (National Autistic Society intervening) [2011] AC 280; [2010] UKSC 33 the High Court found that a failure to take steps to provide education when the state authority responsible for providing it is aware of the absence of the pupil from any form of education could in certain circumstances give rise to a breach of the right. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
As the Privy Council said in Gleaner v Abrahams ([2004] 1 AC 628) “[Defamation] damages often serve not only as compensation but also as an effective and necessary deterrent. [read post]
