Search for: "Adams v. New York"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 2,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am
I’m inclined to believe that the cumulative impact of the Centro-Arfa-Pappas trilogy is responsible for the relative dearth of reported decisions by New York courts over the last eight years involving claims of the sort, and that lawyers representing business owners on both sides of buyouts and other transactions between co-owners have applied the trilogy’s lessons in negotiating and documenting agreements. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
” At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
The first was Gill v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
” New York University School of Law’s Immigrant Rights Clinic and other community groups have teamed up to create a website, Prolonged Detention Stories, that contains an annotated version, with links to supporting photographs, videos, audio, and other material, of a “friend of the court” brief the groups have filed in Jennings v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
Becerra and the Thomas dissent comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, Ronn Blitzer at Law & Crime, David Sherfinski for The Washington Times, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, and Pete Williams at NBC News. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[h]owever the court rules, other abortion cases are likely to follow. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:19 am
” Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, Adam Liptak in The New York Times and Jordan Rudner of the Dallas Morning News also report on the ruling. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” Additional coverage comes from Brent Kendall for The Wall Street Journal, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog, Adam Liptak at The New York Times, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, BBC News, and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
” Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, and Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, who reports that the decision has “major implications for people like Paul Manafort convicted in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe and facing state charges as well. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
In the New York Times, Adam Liptak writes that the Court’s health care decision will “shape, if not define,” the legacy of Chief Justice John Roberts, reasoning that “clashes like the one over the health care law come around only a few times in a century, and he may well complete his service without encountering another case posing such fundamental questions about the structure of American government. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
” From the States and Municipalities Arizona – Arizona Officials Warned Fake Electors Plan Could ‘Appear Treasonous’ MSN – Maggie Haberman and Luke Broadwater (New York Times) | Published: 8/3/2022 Two Arizona Republicans recruited by allies of former President Trump to join an effort to keep him in office after he lost the 2020 election grew so concerned about the plan that they told lawyers working on it that they feared their actions… [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 1:32 pm
The case, US v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 10:30 pm
Adam Liptak has the story in the New York Times.I remain unconvinced. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
Indeed, Adam Liptak of the New York Times reports that the decision may be especially frustrating for businesses because it “reject[ed] the proposed categorical rule in favor of a contextual inquiry,” “provid[ing] only limited guidance to companies and lower courts. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Cadbury Adams USA LLC (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) State Tort claim preempted by patent claim where pleading of bad faith did not meet Iqbal standards: Viskase Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am
In an op-ed for The New York Times, Mary Ziegler writes that “[a]nti-abortion activists … [have] once again asked the Supreme Court to decide that abortion hurts women,” “believe[ing] that arguing harm to women — not fetal rights — is the key to convincing both the court and the nation to let go of Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[i]nstead of the unruly but productive commotion that characterizes the modern Supreme Court argument, the court has announced that the justices will ask questions one by one, in order of seniority. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
” Rick Gladstone of The New York Times reports that “Iran reacted furiously” to Wednesday’s ruling in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:49 pm
Maples’s case to the firm in New York, its mailroom sent them back unopened and stamped ‘Return to Sender’. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:35 am
” Additional coverage comes from Stephen Dinan for The Washington Times, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, and Josh Gerstein at Politico, who reports that “the fact that the Supreme Court’s new opinion is largely a procedural road map and not a final ruling on what records DACA supporters are entitled to may have led to the consensus decision. [read post]
