Search for: "Adams v. New York"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 2,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2012, 4:36 am
Professor Linda Silberman (Martin Lipton Professor of Law, New York University), Adam Johnson (partner, Herbert Smith LLP, London) and Alexander Layton QC (barrister, 20 Essex Street, London) will tackle the subject matter under the chairmanship of Lord Collins of Mapesbury. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:35 am
Following up on Adam Liptak’s Sidebar column for the New York Times (which Nabiha included in yesterday’s round-up), Debra Cassens Weiss at the ABA Journal reports on one of the petitions at next week’s Conference, challenging the use of a Taser by Seattle police on a pregnant woman. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:41 am
At the New York Times, Adam Liptak looks ahead to the May 24 Conference and a petition challenging the use of a Taser on a pregnant woman. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:39 am
Justin Amash and Adam Smith have joined forces on an amendment to modify last year's detention provisions. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
‘, May 2012 Diane Leenheer Zimmerman, New York University School of Law, ‘The ‘New’ Privacy and the ‘Old’: Is Applying the Tort Law of Privacy Like Putting High-Button Shoes on the Internet? [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
Effectiveness of the human rights movement Professor Samuel Moyn of Columbia University has written a thought-provoking piece in the New York Times about the human rights movement. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:06 pm
As Adam Nagourney said in Thursday’s New York Times, the president “was at risk of seeming politically timid and calculating, standing at the sidelines while a large number of Americans – including members of both parties – embraced gay marriage. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:55 am
David Segal of the New York Times reviews the impact of last Term’s AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
An extract was reproduced in New York Magazine here. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am
Sand in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:03 pm
New York Times Supreme Court correspondent Adam Liptak reported earlier this week on the absence since 1993 of a certain 4-letter word from the Court's opinions. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:13 am
Briefly: In the New York Times, Adam Liptak examines the “[t]he most versatile of the classic Anglo-Saxon swear words” and the drop in its appearances in opinions and oral arguments at the Court. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:25 am
City of New York [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
United States (and case names are rarely this clear) was held, and we can all breath easier, even Justice Sonia Sotomayor who was reportedly required to show proof and answer a few easy American history questions before being allowed into One First Street.According to Adam Liptak at the New York Times, things didn't go well. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm
Following oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
In addition to Lyle’s coverage, Greg Stohr and Henry Goldman of Bloomberg report on the denial, as do Reuters, UPI, and Adam Liptak of the New York Times. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:43 am
The New York Times on April 17, 2012 released the following: “By ADAM LIPTAK WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday about an aspect of one of the greatest controversies in American criminal law: the differing treatment of crack and powder cocaine. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:43 am
En 2008, el New York Times también alzó la mano, y el 15 de noviembre de 2011 hubo una nueva petición a John Roberts, para que la Corte permitiera la transmisión en vivo de las jugosas seis horas de argumentos orales del 26 al 28 de marzo pasados (muy lejos aún de las dieciséis horas de argumentos orales que la Suprema Corte requirió en 1962 para Arizona v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 7:11 pm
Guggenheim Museum, New York, 1971 -Guerrilla Girls, Billboard for the Public Art Fund, New York, 1989 -Jill Magid, Becoming Tarden, redacted manuscript, 2004 – 2008, confiscated from Authority to Remove, Tate Modern, London, 2009 – 2010 -David Wojnarowicz, A Fire in My Belly, censored from Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 2010 – 2011 -It’s Me, Beijing, 1998 -Imaginary… [read post]
