Search for: "Barrett v. State"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 1,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2020, 4:05 pm
But residents and workers in 27 other states lacked such protections formally. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 5:01 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s July 2024 ruling in Trump v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
The Transparency Project Blog has a post analysing the recent “civil partnership case”, R v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 6:51 pm
The Supreme Court’s stumble through the City of Chicago v Fulton opinion is no exception to this rule. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 1:06 pm
ShareIn 2003, the Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm
Bush v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
Though it is less well known, and before it became politically necessary for now-jurists John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to dutifully carry out their part of the 2000 Republican strategy that resulted the 5-4 Bush v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm
The case, West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 12:33 pm
In NFIB v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:15 am
Barrett, 208 W.Va. 706, 542 S.E.2d 869 (2000)). [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 3:23 pm
At oral argument a few weeks ago in Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am
Anyway, all of this culminated with the Supreme Court refusing to make this Bush v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
For example, in Winston v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
United States, 328 U.S. 750, 764-65 (1946))... [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
11 May 2025, 8:58 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed the gift in Part V of our ten-part series. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 1:06 pm
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson drew questioning back to the fundamental role of the court’s authority on equal protection, invoking Loving v. [read post]
