Search for: "Birth v. Birth" Results 1641 - 1660 of 7,188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 12:34 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [Belgium] [Habitual Residence] [Wrongful removal] [Petition granted]  In Bikundwa v Ruyenzi, 2022 WL 18110809 (W.D. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:37 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Sanford, which held that Black people had no rights white men were bound to respect, or Plessy v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:53 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its eagerly anticipated rulling in Nordyke v. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 8:30 pm by Stephen Bilkis
-V. to be the legal mother of a child born on May 1, 2009, to the plaintiff N.N. and declaring article 8 of the Domestic Relations Law and Family Court Act §§ 517 and 542 unconstitutional and void and, upon such declaration, directing the defendant to amend the child’s birth certificate, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, entered January 21, 2010, in Nassau County, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which… [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:23 pm
PharmaStem Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
 Casey “outside the unique context of partial birth abortion. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 8:27 am by Bottar Leone, PLLC
According to John Thorpe, co-author of one of the largest studies of cerebral palsy and magnesium sulfate, "[v]irtually every delivery room in the United States is already stocked with magnesium sulfate solutions that are given to pregnant women during childbirth for other reasons. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:14 pm by djackson
It's been nearly fifty years since the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Connecticut v Griswold striking down state bans on birth control. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal’s reasoning The Court noted that the claimant’s wife in the ‘Second’ family had changed her name by deed poll to Frances Hutcheson and both the children of that marriage had Christopher Hutcheson named as father in their birth certificates. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:17 am by David Oscar Markus
Biden and the Democrats could not be more out of step with America as they push abortion on demand for any reason, paid for by taxpayers, up to the moment of birth. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:The Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]