Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 30,957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2017, 7:44 pm
See Julius Samman Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:27 am
Regina v C [2010] EWCA Crim 2971; [2011] WLR (D) 347 “Where a defendant wished to challenge evidence of earlier convictions which the Crown sought to deploy as relevant to the question of whether the defendant was responsible for the commission of the offences for which he was on trial, the defendant’s bare assertion that he did not commit those earlier offences was inadequate; it was essential that the defendant provide a detailed defence statement identifying all the… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:23 am
USA v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:16 pm
Technologies v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
The Second Department used its December 18th decision in El-Dehdan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 7:45 am
The State argued that because of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In 1992, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:29 pm
In Barbey v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:05 am
iStock_000000104056_L1.jpg While the plaintiff failed to meet his burden to show most of the documents were privileged or protected, or, alternatively, that inadvertent disclosure was shown, based on the "interests of fairness and justice," nine pages were entitled to protection in a "rare" yet flexible application of FRE 502(b), in Peterson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 12:24 am
Practice point: Under New York common law, a landowner has a duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition, taking into account all the circumstances, including the likelihood of injury to others, the seriousness of the injury, and the burden of avoiding the risk.Student note:A landowner's duty may arise under the common law, by statute, or by regulation.Case: Alnashmi v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 6:41 am
Judge Pooler dissented from the ruling.The decision in Sorto v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
In Carbajal v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
" E-Contact Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 12:00 pm
The court dealt with whether the burden of proof for the sanction was by clear and convincing evidence or as the district court concluded, by a mere preponderance of the evidence.The court ultimately decided that when the appropriate burden of proof is not clear, the issue is resolved within the limits of proportionality. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:52 pm
” Chisholm v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:03 am
As such it was insufficient to overcome the ‘heavy burden. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:15 pm
In Grace Schools v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
” Courts test FMLA retaliation claims under the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
” Courts test FMLA retaliation claims under the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
