Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 1641 - 1660 of 15,419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2014, 11:39 pm by Mark Summerfield
  The judge at first instance (in Apotex Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (No 4) [2013] FCA 162) had found that the AstraZeneca inventions claimed in the patents at issue lacked an inventive step based, in part, on the reasoning of an earlier Full Court panel in Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis [2009] FCAFC 134. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm by Elie Mystal
Here’s seemingly every affirmative action conversation I’ve had since I started working at Above the Law:PLEBES: Affirmative action is racist — reverse-racist. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 3:14 pm by Shahram Miri
" Conversely in the Estate of Heggstad (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th, the trust there did describe the property with some particularity. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 4:15 am by Gretchen Miller
The Federal Circuit’s recent majority opinion and Chief Judge Prost’s dissenting opinion in the GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A cause of action for conversion has a three-year statute of limitations (see CPLR 214 [3]) and accrues on the date the conversion takes place (see DiMatteo v Cosentino, 71 AD3d 1430, 1431 [4th Dept 2010]). [read post]