Search for: "Cable v. State"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 1,821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
LOCAL GOVERNMENT* On February 2nd, the Federal District Court in Central Islip began a trial in Francarl Realty v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:20 am
Tornillo and NAACP v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 3:24 pm
Comcast Corp., 498 F.3d 1216 (11th Cir. 2007) (Cable Act); Kristian v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:53 am
Condux v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:10 am
Wolfe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 2:01 am
See, e.g., Tibor, 1999 ND 150, ¶ 26, 598 NW.2d 480 ("modern transportation reduces the measure of distance from days to hours, and instant communication is available through phone and cable links"); McCoy v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 1:26 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS
[read post]
21 Jan 2009, 10:49 am
In Sowinski v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:13 pm
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:38 am
See also Cable Connection Inc., et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:51 pm
The Supreme Court on Monday sought the government’s views on a major issue of copyright law, in Cable News Network, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 7:04 am
Docket: 08-448 Title: Cable News Network, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
The ads were for spy software, dietary supplements and cable television descrambling kits.. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 8:30 am
States will strengthen their own certification processes, and at least one major state will stop requiring federal certification. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 3:35 am
A communication from one location within a state to another location within that same state which passes through another state may satisfy the interstate requirement, even if the defendant has no reason to know of the interstate character of the communication.U.S. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 1:10 pm
I suspect that it is true of other states. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
