Search for: "California v. Force" Results 1641 - 1660 of 6,450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
The Data Protection Report has covered the most recent amendments to the California Consumer Privacy Act being signed into force. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Hunton Privacy blog had a post on the California Governor Gavin Newsom, who announced that he signed all five of the California Legislature’s September 2019 amendments to the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”). [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:21 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “In a major shift in United States military policy in Syria, the White House said on Sunday that President Trump had given his endorsement for a Turkish military operation that would sweep away American-backed Kurdish forces near the border in Syria. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm by Florian Mueller
The Northern California complaint was brought in May, but Nokia's and Sharp's patent assertion campaigns against Daimler started before. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
Picasso case (United States District Court for the Northern District of California). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
 "I was forcing myself to stay awake and work on the opinion," she told Biskupic (242). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:23 am by Eugene Volokh
University of Southern California (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 221, 247-248; Doe v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm by MOTP
A Texas law firm sought to force clients residing in California to arbitrate their legal malpractice claim against it in Houston, to which the former clients, who had already sued the law firm in California, responded by filing a special appearance challenging personal jurisdiction over them. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Compelled speech generally occurs when the government forces individuals to express government-approved messages, such as by saluting the flag. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
”  The Chief Justice added that the guarantee of a federal forum under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 “rings hollow for takings plaintiffs, who are forced to litigate their claims in state court. [read post]