Search for: "Commitment of M B" Results 1641 - 1660 of 3,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2014, 10:08 am by Lyle Denniston
Three judges who also took part in the ruling — Chief Judge Merrick B. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:13 am
" What's more, even an assistant DA said of Tango Blast members who commit new crimes on the outside, "I don't think they are committing their crimes for the purposes of the gang. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 9:37 pm
Jallow, Chief Prosecutor, ICTR, "The Emerging International Criminal Justice System: Impact on the Fight Against Impunity" (.doc) Justice Hassan B. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm by Tobias Thienel
I must admit I'm still not entirely attracted by this argument. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm by admin
 In 1989, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit resolved an appeal involving expert witnesses who relied upon epidemiologic studies by concluding that it did not have to resolve questions of bias and confounding because the studies relied upon had presented their results with confidence intervals.[4] Judges and expert witnesses persistently interpreted single confidence intervals from one study as having a 95 percent probability of containing the actual parameter.[5]… [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 12:43 pm by Geoffrey Manne
As I read the summary of Sections 2.1.1.a and 2.1.1.b, assuming this summary is accurate and complete, they would prevent loyalty discounts or other inducements paired with exclusivity or market share commitments. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
(B) That is not to say that all of the Justices vote in a partisan or even a political way all of the time. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:59 pm by Bruce Boyden
I’m just interested in the legal question as an Internet Law issue. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:10 am by Susan Brenner
(I’m using the Indiana harassment statute, Indiana Code § 35-45-2-2(a)(4), as the basis of that general definition; the Indiana statute is quite similar in substance to harassment statutes in other states.) [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:00 pm
Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the public nudity statute is not unconstitutionally vague, but that the State failed to present evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Weideman committed public nudity, as a Class B misdemeanor. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:39 am by Jeralyn
Which is another reason why I'm voting to let the governor go. [read post]