Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C" Results 1641 - 1660 of 4,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2018, 6:02 am by Jimerson Birr
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc., 998 So. 2d 1102, 111 (Fla. 2008), aff’d, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:02 am by Jimerson Birr
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc., 998 So. 2d 1102, 111 (Fla. 2008), aff’d, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm by Howard Knopf
It does not seek to enjoin Euro Excellence from distributing Toblerone and Côte d'Or chocolate bars. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am by Sander van Rijnswou
You can't slice up a priority rightToday we have the  first instance decision in the opposition against European patent 2771468 having the title "ENGINEERING OF SYSTEMS, METHODS AND OPTIMIZED GUIDE COMPOSITIONS FOR SEQUENCE MANIPULATION" (PCT/US13/74819). [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These allegations generally state causes of action sounding in legal malpractice (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d at 49; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 1.15 [c] [4]), and violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 14 [2014]; cf. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:44 pm by Ronald Mann
” Thus, Yakima “resolved nothing about the law of sovereign immunity,” as the Lundgrens “[c]ommendably … acknowledged … at oral argument. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am by Diane Tweedlie
"Hence, for an intervention to be admissible and treated as an opposition pursuant to Article 105(2) EPC, "proceedings for infringement" must have been initiated against the intervener, i.e. respondent II in the present case.It must then be assessed whether the independent evidentiary proceedings under § 485 ZPO ("selbständiges Beweisverfahren", also known as "Beweissicherungsverfahren" or "Düsseldorfer Verfahren") which have been… [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am by Diane Tweedlie
"Hence, for an intervention to be admissible and treated as an opposition pursuant to Article 105(2) EPC, "proceedings for infringement" must have been initiated against the intervener, i.e. respondent II in the present case.It must then be assessed whether the independent evidentiary proceedings under § 485 ZPO ("selbständiges Beweisverfahren", also known as "Beweissicherungsverfahren" or "Düsseldorfer Verfahren") which have been… [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
The National Council on Disability has posted the following Notice of Funding Opportunity: Bioethics and Disability. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
We may not be representative of different companies b/c we are small & receive a small number of requests that vary in what they ask for—readership over a period of time v. individual info. [read post]