Search for: "DAVIS V. STATE"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 6,175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2018, 4:45 pm
United States, 328 U.S. 750, 758 (1946). [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 10:45 am
In the 2011 case NASA v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:12 pm
Davis (link to bio on Court webpage) Judge Mary J. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:07 am
State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
" State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
Davis 17-6883 Issue: Whether—when the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm
United States, 17-646, Tyler v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:00 am
Circuit’s interpretation of Skinner in Davis v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:18 pm
Supreme Court case California v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:32 am
Sanchez-Benitez v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:55 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
Furthermore, collective bargaining agreements or other contracts or other federal, state or local laws also sometimes impose additional requirements for employers to pay higher “prevailing wages,” apply special rules for counting compensable work hours, and provide specified fringe benefits or other special compensation or protections or other wages, when the employer is a government contractor or subcontractor covered by the Service Contract Act, the Davis… [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
Davis 17-6883 Issue: Whether—when the U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
Related article. * Wendy Davis: Judge Tosses Suit Over Vacation Rental Review. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
Davis (2008), upholding Kentucky’s tax credit for investing in Kentucky bonds but not other states’ bonds. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
“The twin purposes of the doctrine are to protect the integrity of the judicial process and to protect judicial integrity by avoiding the risk of inconsistent results in two proceedings'” (Davis v Citibank, N.A. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
Davis, 17-6883 Issue: Whether — when the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Davis L. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Circuit’s al-Bihani v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:50 am
See Department of Revenue of Ky. v. [read post]
