Search for: "DOES 1 through 75" Results 1641 - 1660 of 2,433
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 7:47 am by lawmrh
CategoryID=20011116147985140428&UGUID=&offset=1 ____________________________________________________________________ Oregon State Bar’s “Making a Difference: Mentoring New Lawyers” Complimentary program approved for 1.25 General CLE, 1.25 Ethics, and .75 Access to Justice credits. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:57 am by Joan Heminway
 This does not mean that any law compels a corporation to be socially responsible. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:32 am by Ray Mullman
Those with income of 100-150% of the FPL receive 75% of the full amount. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:33 am by Susan Brenner
Easter, 75 Ohio App.3d 22, 598 N.E.2d 845 (Ohio Court of Appeals 1991). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:25 pm by Andrew Cross
"The Commissions have determined that a foreign exchange transaction, which initially is styled as or intended to be a "foreign exchange forward," and which is modified so that the parties settle in a reference currency (rather than settle through the exchange of the 2 specified currencies), does not conform with the definition of "foreign exchange forward" in the CEA. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:25 pm by Andrew Cross
"The Commissions have determined that a foreign exchange transaction, which initially is styled as or intended to be a "foreign exchange forward," and which is modified so that the parties settle in a reference currency (rather than settle through the exchange of the 2 specified currencies), does not conform with the definition of "foreign exchange forward" in the CEA. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:47 pm by San Antonio Lawyer
(f) In this section: (1) “Amusement park” means a permanent indoor or outdoor facility or park where amusement rides are available for use by the public that is located in a county with a population of more than one million, encompasses at least 75 acres in surface area, is enclosed with access only through controlled entries, is open for operation more than 120 days in each calendar year, and has security guards on the premises at all times. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
” Whether through exchange-traded funds, mutual funds, or directly, investors currently hold 75% of the over 1 million bonds that are outstanding. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:07 pm by Administrator
The fiduciary did not designate any of the funds on the platform or available through the brokerage window, self-directed brokerage account, or similar plan arrangement as “designated investment alternatives” under the plan. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:57 am by Charles Johnson
In actuality, the offense of On-line Solicitation or Importuning may be completed merely through the communication or “chat. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am by Kenneth Vercammen
Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67, 75 (1954), to which we owe the motion court no special deference. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
Channel 1 – Thorpe Insulation Addresses Insurer Standing to Object to Plan and Assignability of Insurance Contracts to Plan Trusts Bottom Line: Our first case discusses whether provisions of a chapter 11 plan were “insurance neutral” and, as such, whether insurers had the right to be heard in contesting the asbestos-liability channeling injunction of the plan. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:49 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via CrunchBaseSix months after deciding that a consumer electronics blog was not covered by Illinois' shield law [75 Ill. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
See further, Harrow London Borough Council v Qazi [2003] UKHL 43; [2004] 1 A.C. 983; [2003] 3 W.L.R. 792; [2003] H.L.R. 75, per Lord Bingham [22] and  Birmingham CC v Doherty [2008] UKHL 57, [2009] 1 A.C. 367, [2008] H.L.R. 45, in the written submissions for Birmingham (noted at 391F-G, 392E-F and per Lord Hope at 401E. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
See further, Harrow London Borough Council v Qazi [2003] UKHL 43; [2004] 1 A.C. 983; [2003] 3 W.L.R. 792; [2003] H.L.R. 75, per Lord Bingham [22] and  Birmingham CC v Doherty [2008] UKHL 57, [2009] 1 A.C. 367, [2008] H.L.R. 45, in the written submissions for Birmingham (noted at 391F-G, 392E-F and per Lord Hope at 401E. [read post]