Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 1641 - 1660 of 29,811
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
California, 403 U.S. 15, 25 (1971), that a defendant who walked through a courthouse wearing a jacket bearing the words “F**k the Draft” was engaged in protected speech. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 4:59 am by jonathanturley
Forbes, Inc., 241 F.3d 552 (7th Cir. 2001), opinion prevailed as a defense. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:55 pm
 Pix Credit here At the invitation of my publisher I have been working on the production of a comprehensive commentary of the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 2:46 pm by Shea Denning
Jarvis, 236 F.3d 149, 167-68 (4th Cir. 2000) (en banc). [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am by Michael Caruso
 Gideon, along with the highly influential report of Professor Francis Allen (years later my 1st year Crim Law professor) to then-Attorney General Robert F. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:20 am by Seán Binder
” Access for defendants would be granted on a “case by case basis,” he added. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:09 am by Dennis Crouch
But after casting doubt on the Fullam doctrine in In re Fuetterer, 319 F.2d 259 (CCPA 1963)[2], the CCPA settled the issue conclusively in favor of such claims in In re Swinehart, 439 F.2d 210 (CCPA 1971). [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
”[3] Mann naturally claims that the defendants’ statements are false and defamatory; the defendants contend that their statements are true. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:51 am by Unknown
At 2:39 pm on a chilly but sunny Saturday, just six miles off the coast of South Carolina, an F-22 fighter jet from Langley Air Force Base fired a Sidewinder air-to-air missile to take down a balloon—the size of three school buses—that had drifted across the United States. [read post]
The Pulsiver petitioners specifically ask the Supreme Court to decide whether the “and” in Section 3553(f)(1) of the First Step Act requires a defendant to not have met all three criteria in order to qualify or whether the defendant is automatically ineligible for the alternate sentencing guidelines if they do not meet one of the criteria. [read post]