Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 1641 - 1660
of 5,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm
[vi] Shelby County v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:12 pm
Yes, but not unless the platform has significant market power vis-à-vis rival platforms. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:11 pm
By discharging the discriminatees on October 12, Respondent prevented them by taking any further group action vis-à-vis Cruz-Moore’s criticisms. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 1:01 pm
Anti-Israel viewpoints too often drift into Jew baiting, but it does not have to be that way, as I recently learned in a conversation with a Hillel director at a southern university. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:33 am
In Batiste, the plaintiff was injured on the job, which meant that his sole remedy vis a vis his employer was workers' compensation. [read post]
8 May 2012, 2:14 pm
" To do otherwise, vis-a-vis a "quasi Anders brief" runs afoul of these principles. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:00 am
The binary approach is a double edged sword for those who wish to guarantee protection to a civilian population living under occupation, not only because of the far-reaching consequences of deciding that the law of occupation does not apply but also because of the equally far-reaching consequences of finding that it does. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Because the bank’s money, not the drawer-depositor’s money, is used to pay the check, that payment cannot be preferential vis-a-vis the drawer. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:01 am
It is overly reverential: Lincoln may have taken an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution, but Miller seems to have taken the same oath vis-a-vis Lincoln. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:43 pm
While PRN is commendable in this regard, a recurrent problem I encounter in representing pharmacists before the Texas State Board of Pharmacy is that PRN does not fully disclose upfront the significant limitations in their confidentiality protections and their captured role vis a vis the Pharmacy Board. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:10 am
“In conclusion,” Judge Robinson explained that while the licensees “have retained (or have been granted back) certain rights in the patents-in-suit, the court does not deem such rights ‘substantial’ vis a vis those held by MMI. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 12:07 pm
Is the real-world situation vis-à-vis the federal deficit more like a prisoner’s dilemma or a coordination game? [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
The applicant applied for restitution of rights pursuant to A 122.The RS refused restitution of rights on the single ground that A 122 provides only for restoration of rights where there has been failure to observe a time limit which it is for the applicant to observe, whereas the time limit not observed in the present case was one which it was for the UKPO to observe.The Board agrees with the RS:[2] While it is clear that the appellant and its representative were in no way responsible for what has… [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 4:38 pm
The Richard judgment does undoubtedly expand the ambit of individuals’ privacy rights vis-à-vis criminal investigations, but it is unlikely to set the dangerous precedent for journalism that many in the media have expressed. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 8:36 pm
Thus, it is well worth watching what the Court does in this case in the coming months. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Not only does this bias lead to inaccurate predictions for patients, but it also creates negative feedback loops, Hoffman and Podgurski contend. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 12:20 am
Does anyone understand this differently? [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:52 pm
The Board noted that the existence of these registrations does not evidence use, nor does it establish the public's familiarity with the marks. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
This party has not disputed the finding of the OD that document D2 does not mention at all DCs in gel or other water containing forms and that documents D4 and D5 are totally silent as to the nature of the materials that could be used for packaging or containing gel DCs during storage. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:43 am
Regrettably the page was taken off line as part of Jones’ legal offensive against the criticism (does Facebook not allow parody pages?) [read post]
