Search for: "Doe v Great Expectations" Results 1641 - 1660 of 3,541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The court limited review to the following issue: Under what circumstances, if any, does the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:48 pm by Florian Mueller
The fact that the judges didn't ask questions about it and that counsel had a different focus does not at all mean that the related part of Samsung's appeal is going nowhere. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:22 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Court does not announce when opinions will be issued, but it is expected that the decisions in these cases likely will be issued in January or February 2018. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:22 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Court does not announce when opinions will be issued, but it is expected that the decisions in these cases likely will be issued in January or February 2018. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 2:47 pm by Jennifer E. Benda
In that instance, because the developer expects to benefit as a result of the easement, the law does not allow a charitable contribution deduction, essentially because the contribution lacks donative intent or because the donation lacks value when weighed against the value of the expected benefit. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:51 am by SHG
Reversing the Appellate Division, First Department, the New York Court of Appeals held in People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by SHG
That sentence is one that this Court never expected to see outside the pages of a dystopian novel, or perhaps the pages of The Onion. [read post]