Search for: "Doe v. Holder"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 6,694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2022, 5:14 am
Haier approach to Huawei v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 2:40 am
Were it otherwise, [trademark holders] could effectively monopolize descriptive terms. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 11:55 am
Ten months ago, in Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:45 pm
Last week, the Arizona Court of Appeals heard oral argument in the case White Mountain Health Center v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
There was no evidence of actual confusion presented by the University, and it is important to note that confusion does not mean call to mind, as set out in University of Notre Dame v J.C Gourmet FoodImports Co., Inc., Appelle, 703 F.2d 1372 (Fed. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 5:37 am
While his Unwired Planet v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
U.S., U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Internet poses new challenges to trademark holders, but equitable jurisdiction cannot solve all their problems. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
Does Bilski bar patents on genetic diagnostics? [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 9:05 am
Microsoft was a third party beneficiary entitled to rely on these contracts (Microsoft Corp. v Motorola, Inc. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am
Further, of practical significance is that the power holder does not have actual control over the assets, and cannot exercise any such power without going through the Trustee, who controls the assets. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:03 pm
Novo Nordisk A/S v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 11:49 am
Grace v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm
In light of what a Federal Circuit panel--Chief Judge Kimberly Moore and Circuit Judges Timothy Dyk and Raymond Chen--said at a Tuesday hearing in Thales v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:50 am
FTC and Broadcom v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:34 pm
WaveDivision Holdings LLC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 12:10 pm
The removed cases, Mayorkas v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:10 pm
Medik had argued, citing Celanese international Corp v BP Chemicals Ltd [1999] RPC 203, that it was entitled to deduct a portion of general overheads - cost of premises and general staff costs. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:40 pm
[Post by Venkat] Asis Internet Servs. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:23 am
The long awaited ruling in Mission Products Holding, Inc. v. [read post]
