Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 15,476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:34 am
There has been an increase in the proportion of Americans who believe global warming is not happening (23%, up 7 percentage points since April 2013). [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:14 am
Instead, such use could also rely on the presumption of compatibility in Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:39 pm
Rogers, Jr. on December 23, 2010 finding a violation of Section 337 in Certain MEMS Devices and Products Containing Same (Inv. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 8:23 am
” § 739.601(1), Fla. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
§ 274a.2 (b) (1) (viii) (A) (3). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Sept. 23, 2011). [read post]
22 May 2020, 10:00 pm
§3109.04(F)(1). [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
What does industry make of it all? [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The application claimed priority from a Japanese application.On June 23, 2008 the EPO issued a communication under R 56(1) and A 90(1), in which it informed the [applicant] that “Figure 11”, which was mentioned and described on page 13 of the description, was missing. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Baker (1999) 20 Cal.4th 23, 33 [82 Cal.Rptr.2d 610, 971 P.2d 986].) [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm
All documents referred to shall be [...](4) Any part of a party's appeal case which does not meet the requirements in paragraph 2 is to be regarded as an amendment, unless the party demonstrates that this part was admissibly raised and maintained in the proceedings leading to the decision under appeal. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 3:44 pm
" Polston, 255 Va. at 504, 498 S.E.2d at 926; Derr, 242 Va. at 422-23, 410 S.E.2d at 667. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
He's found guilty.The lawyer says he'll appeal, and does, but nothing comes of it. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:48 am
Reg. 14059 (March 23, 2010). [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 5:08 pm
The trial lasted for 11 days, and the jury deliberated for 1 1/2 days before returning with a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 6:34 am
Does the First Amendment include a right to gather information using flying drones? [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 4:54 am
This update serves as a follow up to the series of alerts issued since 23 March 2020. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The right to be heard also requires that those involved be given an opportunity not only to present comments but also to have those comments considered and fully taken into account in the written decision in a manner that enables [them] to understand, on an objective basis, the reasons for the decision (see R 2/14 of 2[2] April 2016, reasons 6; R 23/10 of 15 July 2011, reasons 2; R 19/12 of 12 April 2016, reasons 6 to 6.3). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:34 am
N.J.S.A. 9:17-44(a) (the Artificial Insemination Statute). [4] Nowhere in the Act does the presumption of parentage under Section 43(a) extend to a wife whose husband, while married, fathers a child with another woman, N.J.S.A. 9:17-43(a)(1), or to a wife who simply acknowledges in writing her maternity of the child, N.J.S.A. 9:17-43(a)(6). [read post]
