Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 1641 - 1660 of 13,846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2013, 7:15 am by Sai Vinod
Such coincidental reference to trade name does not constitute use of the mark ‘in the course of trade’, in my opinion. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 11:01 pm
UTEP 58 Houston Cougars 41 How does a team such as UTEP (2-3) that didn't generate 58 yards total offense in its game last week (a 64-7 loss to Texas) turnaround and score that many points in handing formerly 12-ranked Houston (3-1) its first defeat of the season? [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by Joel R. Brandes
" The parties were divorced on January 29, 2007, and, in October 2008, the subject child moved from his mother's home to the father's home. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:57 pm by Steven G. Pearl
KPIX-TV (9th Cir. 5/29/12) --- F.3d ---, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal addresses the use of statistical evidence in disparate treatment age discrimination cases. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Alternatively, they argued that R.C. 4111.14(B)(1) does not apply to claims for minimum wage violations brought under the Constitution. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:36 pm by Cari Rincker
”[1] Estrangement does not mean that the relationship has come to an end legally, however. [read post]
4 May 2009, 4:32 am
Ordinarily, leaving property in a friend's keeping does not demonstrate an intent to relinquish any privacy interest in the property. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:09 am by David Canton
In other words, 1 email or text message to 1 recipient can be considered spam. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
The safe harbor applies for original and amended federal income tax returns filed after Sept. 29, 2010. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
The safe harbor applies for original and amended federal income tax returns filed after Sept. 29, 2010. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:05 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the requirement of A 123(3) is fulfilled. [3.4]However, the Board does not consider the explanations of the [patentee] with regard to the requirement of A 123(2) to be correct. [read post]