Search for: "Does 1 - 33"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 6,149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
This does not mean there cannot be other restrictions on voting, but the government must justify them under section 1: see, for example, Fitzgerald v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:11 am
View the Video on YouTube Video Transcript0:05 one of the things 0:07 that you know my parents instilled is 0:12 that there’s an opportunity every day 0:15 for us to make a difference in someone’s 0:18 life 0:21 and many days I’ll miss 0:24 it but the great news is is that I’ll 0:27 have another opportunity tomorrow you 0:30 know I think that um there are so many 0:33 people that um don’t have the blessings 0:38 uh in terms… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:25 am
Video Transcript 0:05 one of the things 0:07 that you know my parents instilled is 0:12 that there’s an opportunity every day 0:15 for us to make a difference in someone’s 0:18 life 0:21 and many days I’ll miss 0:24 it but the great news is is that I’ll 0:27 have another opportunity tomorrow you 0:30 know I think that um there are so many 0:33 people that um don’t have the blessings 0:38 uh in terms of being able to do things … [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:02 am
This should immediately strike one as odd because one does not usually think of Kerala or Pondicherry as the most crime-ridden parts of India. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 9:59 am
Heintzman’s personal views and does not constitute legal advice. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:48 pm
See our blog on this 11/1/12. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 1:18 pm
Under these circumstances, preclusion of pre-enforcement judicial review does not violate the Sacketts' due process rights. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:55 am
Therefore, the use of satellite surveillance as a tool of environmental law does not violate the Fourth Amendment. _________________________________________________ 1 33 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:56 am
” 33 Pa. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
” Id. at 33 n.25. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:32 am
§ 921(a)(33). [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 2:28 pm
§18.62(a)(1) and Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Fed. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:32 am
§ 921(a)(33). [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:26 pm
Specifically, the Court concluded that a 1:1 ratio is a fair upper limit. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 3:37 pm
Joost v Castel (1939) 33 CA2d 138; City of Los Angeles v Greines (1930) 107 CA 481. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:59 am
Only 33 percent of those surveyed said the number of non-food recalls had increased, and 59 percent said they'd stayed about the same. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:26 pm
Specifically, the Court concluded that a 1:1 ratio is a fair upper limit. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:51 pm
Excessive delay is, of course, contrary to the object of the Rules as set out in Rule 1-3(1): to secure “the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every proceeding on its merits. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:01 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006), the Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 7:31 am
The linked article is minimal, but it does say the recounters haven't found any "major anomalies. [read post]
